A forthcoming review of the Prevent anti-terror programme is an opportunity for long-standing critics to “stand up and be counted”, a chief constable has said.
Simon Cole, the national policing lead for the scheme, challenged those who have complained of a “lack of independent analysis and oversight” to use their chance to influence policy and suggest ways it could be improved.
“Failure to do so would demonstrate that all they ever had was arguments based on inaccuracies or myth, and no real ideas about how to tackle radicalisation amongst the young and the vulnerable,” he said.
Now is the time for hard fact, not twisted fictionChief Constable Simon Cole
Having previously rejected calls for the move, the Government announced last month that Prevent would be subject to an independent review.
Mr Cole’s remarks chime with comments by Security Minister Ben Wallace who, when announcing the review, said it “should expect those critics of Prevent, who often use distortions and spin, to produce solid evidence of their allegations”.
With an annual budget of about £40 million, Prevent aims to stop people becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism.
While police and ministers have emphasised it is a crucial plank of anti-terror efforts, the scheme has repeatedly come under fire, with critics labelling it heavy-handed and “toxic”.
In his new blog, our lead for Prevent, CC Simon Cole (@CCLeicsPolice), believes the independent review of Prevent is the time for hard fact, not twisted fiction. Read it here: https://t.co/tsxx6qoFYL #Prevent #Safeguarding pic.twitter.com/w3RjNin70e— National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) (@PoliceChiefs) February 5, 2019
In a blog posted on the National Police Chiefs’ Council website, Mr Cole, the head of Leicestershire Police, welcomed the announcement that Prevent would be reviewed.
He said: “We now have an opportunity to demonstrate what the programme can offer, and for unbiased experts to weigh that up against the criticisms, misleading rhetoric and false perceptions which have plagued the scheme.
“An independent review should also have been welcome news for those who have spent so long criticising the programme, because they will now have an opportunity to air their concerns and suggest how changes to Prevent might improve the way we tackle radicalisation and extremism in the UK.
“Now is the time for hard fact, not twisted fiction.
“It is the time for anyone with genuine concerns or policy ideas to stand up and be counted, or else never be able to fairly criticise Prevent again. ”
He said prevention has never been more important, given that police and security services are running more than 700 live counter-terror investigations.
“Prevent is a crucial part of the battle against terrorists, and hopefully this review can be the next stage in our development of the work, our building of the evidence base, and us making Prevent more inclusive,” Mr Cole wrote.
He said he expected the review to reflect on the growth of far-right referrals to Prevent, which increased by more than a third in 2017/18.
Anyone concerned that someone they know might be at risk can refer them to Prevent.
When authorities conclude there is a danger that the person could be drawn into terrorism, they can be supported through a scheme known as Channel.
Engagement is voluntary and it is not a criminal sanction.
The number of referrals to Prevent for concerns related to right-wing extremism rose from 968 in 2016/17 to 1,312 in the following year, a 36% increase.
Referrals over Islamist extremism concerns fell by 14% from 3,704 to 3,197.
In total 7,318 individuals were flagged up to Prevent in the 12 months to March last year, including more than 2,000 aged under 15.
In most cases, referrals are found to require no further action or are passed to other services.