Belfast Telegraph

Home News UK

Disgraced GP facing jail for sex assaults on 23 girls and women

Dr Manish Shah cited Angelina Jolie and Jade Goody as he persuaded victims as young as 11 to undergo unnecessary intimate examinations, a court heard.

Manish Shah (Yui Mok/PA)
Manish Shah (Yui Mok/PA)

By Emily Pennink, PA Old Bailey Correspondent

A GP who cited the cases of Angelina Jolie and Jade Goody to instill fear in his patients is facing jail for molesting 23 female patients.

Dr Manish Shah preyed on cancer concerns to persuade patients as young as 17 to undergo unnecessary intimate examinations for his own sexual gratification, the Old Bailey heard.

Over five years, between May 2009 and June 2013, he assaulted six patients of the Mawney Medical Centre, the court was told.

Shah, 50, of Romford, east London, denied wrongdoing, claiming he had been practising “defensive medicine”.

But following an Old Bailey trial, he was found guilty of 25 sexual offences against the six victims.

bpanews_b17c9d0c-0093-456e-93e5-f2c55874d72f_embedded235437083
Manish Shah arriving at the Old Bailey (John Stillwell/PA)

The jury was told Shah has already been convicted of similar allegations relating to 17 other women, bringing the total number to 23.

Shah looking down at his lap in the dock as the jury delivered majority verdicts after 26 hours of deliberations.

Judge Anne Molyneux adjourned sentencing for all the offences until February 7.

Prosecutor Kate Bex QC told jurors that Shah played on the women’s fear of cancer to consent to examinations, but without being properly informed.

Some of the victims were particularly vulnerable because of their young age or because of their family history of the disease.

Ms Bex said: “Fear is an incredible motivator and few health concerns are scarier than cancer. Dr Shah exploited that and used it for his own personal gratification.”

bpanews_b17c9d0c-0093-456e-93e5-f2c55874d72f_embedded235437087
Manish Shah arriving at The Old Bailey

Shah brought up the news story about Hollywood star Jolie having a preventative mastectomy as he asked a woman if she would like him to examine her breasts.

He also mentioned Goody to another woman, saying an examination was in her best interests, it was claimed.

Ms Bex told jurors that one theme of the case was the defendant’s “sexualised” behaviour.

He would give patients hugs and kisses, singling some out as “special” and his “star”, saying he had a soft spot for them.

He would not always wear gloves and left one patient entirely naked on an examination table, jurors heard.

Shah attempted to justify an examination in medical notes by suggesting it was “requested”, the court heard.

bpanews_b17c9d0c-0093-456e-93e5-f2c55874d72f_embedded246135435
Angelina Jolie (Ian West/PA Wire)

He flouted NHS guidelines on giving healthy women under 25 smear tests and routine breast examinations on women under 50, which were said to cause more harm than good, Ms Bex told jurors.

He also breached guidelines on the use of chaperones during intimate examinations.

Shah denied wrongdoing and his barrister Zoe Johnson QC told jurors he was a “cautious, insecure, perhaps at times incompetent GP”.

The fact of Shah’s previous conviction did not necessarily make for a case of “once a sex offender always a sex offender”, Ms Johnson argued.

Acting Detective Superintendent Richard McDonagh, from Scotland Yard, said: “Shah was a long-serving doctor who was well-known in the community, and trusted and liked by his patients, many who had him as their GP for many years.

“They were unaware that Shah was carrying out unnecessary, invasive examinations on female patients for his own sexual gratification, after giving his victims misleading clinical advice. These offences are particularly grave due to Shah’s abuse of his position, and of the trust placed in him as a family doctor.

“Today’s conviction is the culmination of a huge amount of work on what was a complex, sensitive investigation which was supported by NHS England. I would like to acknowledge the women who were victims of Shah, and who supported the prosecution and gave evidence at Shah’s trials.

“Without their evidence, Shah may not have been brought to justice, but the weight of evidence against him at both trials was overwhelming.”

PA

Popular

From Belfast Telegraph