Holyrood backs general principles of Bill to ban smacking
MSPs backed the Bill at Stage One by 80 votes to 29 with two abstentions.
Scotland has taken a “momentous step” towards banning smacking, as MSPs overwhelmingly approved the general principles of new legislation to achieve this.
Children’s campaigners welcomed the vote in Holyrood, to approve Green MSP John Finnie’s Bill by 80 votes to 29, although SNP MSPs Christine Grahame and Richard Lyle abstained.
As the proposal was debated Mr Finnie likened the legislation, which would remove the existing defence of “justifiable assault” from Scots law, to measures such as the smoking ban and the outlawing of drink-driving.
In such issues legislative change had been needed before there was a cultural shift, the Green MSP said.
Green Win! @JohnFinnieHI's #SPEqualProtection Bill has been backed by parliament following its stage one debate with 80 votes for and 29 against. The Bill will now proceed to the next stage of parliamentary scrutiny. pic.twitter.com/HrekWCHptq— Scottish Greens (@scotgp) May 28, 2019
He stated: “I firmly believe that as with the smoking ban we will see public opinion change over time.
“As Bruce Adamson, Scotland’s children and young people’s commissioner told the committee ‘you need legislation to drive the cultural change’.
“In that regard this issue could be seen in the same way as seatbelts in cars, drink driving and smoking in pubs.
“On such issues you need to lead with the legislation in order to deliver the cultural change.”
Opponents of the Bill have raised fears that it could criminalise thousands parents for disciplining their children
But Mr Finnie inisisted it was “time for action” as he said: “A growing body of international evidence shows that physical punishment of children is harmful to their development and not an effective means of discipline.”
He continued: “We often in Scotland talk about zero tolerance for domestic abuse and violence, but we allow the use of physical punishment for children.
“This sends a message to our children that hitting someone is a way of resolving a dispute, or if you don’t like their behaviour.”
Absolutely delighted at the momentous step MSPs have taken today by passing @JohnFinnieHI #SPEqualProtection Bill at Stage 1 with an overwhelming majority in favour. Our CEO @margl43 comments: pic.twitter.com/5KYxrjmiZW— Children 1st (@children1st) May 28, 2019
Tory MSP Oliver Mundell spoke out against the proposals, saying that “however wellmeaning” the Bill was it was “an assault on family life”.
The Conservative said: “The fundamental problem is that this Bill does more harm than good and it doesn’t live up to its name.
“Let me be clear, violence against children is wrong.
“On that point I’d hope we could all agree.
“However, that’s where I depart company from other members who speak enthusiastically in support of this proposal.
“Because when it comes to the proportionality of subjecting good parents to criminalisation, and the suggestion that it is justified and reasonable for the state to intervene in family life where child welfare is not at risk, I cannot agree.”
Richard Lyle MSP says he will be out of step with his SNP colleagues on @JohnFinnieHI @SPEqualProtection Bill, announcing he will abstain. He says the Bill risks parents being criminalised and police and social workers wasting valuable resources @ScotParl pic.twitter.com/LvVrKIYTb0— Be Reasonable (@reasonablescot) May 28, 2019
However Children’s minister Maree Todd however insisted: “Our intention is not to criminalise parents, out intention is to provide early support using a getting it right for every child approach, which we have been using for many years, continuing to use that to recognise the situations where parents need support and to put in support.”
With the Scottish Government backing the Bill she added: “We’re not telling parents how to parent, what we will do is continue to provide support for parents so they can decide for themselves the best way to take care of their children.”
The defence of “reasonable chastisement” is “antiquated,” Ms Todd insisted, saying at its heart was the “concept that it can sometimes be reasonable to strike a child”.
She told MSPs: “That is completely at odds with our aim for Scotland to be the best place in the world for children to grow up.
“We can contribute to that aim by providing children with he same legal protection from assaults as adults have.”
Labour’s Mary Fee echoed that message, saying: “By giving children equal protection from assault, we are protecting children and safeguarding children’s human rights.”
Mary Glasgow, the chief executive of the charity Children 1st, said: “Today, MSPs have taken a momentous step towards Scotland becoming the first UK country to end physical punishment of children.
“The overwhelming majority in favour of the Bill at Holyrood shows politicians want what we all want for our children, for them to grow up feeling loved, safe and happy, in the arms of their family.”
Matt Forde, national head of service for NSPCC Scotland said: “It is simply wrong that children do not have the same protection from assault as adults.
“Rectifying this unfair legal loophole is a common-sense step, which would bring Scotland into line with dozens of other countries across the world.
“The Scottish Parliament has listened to the evidence and acted in the best interests of young people.
“Physical punishment is harmful to children and its days are rightly numbered.”