'Keep the Queen's head on stamps'
A business minister is "extremely confident" the Queen's head would remain on postage stamps even if the Royal Mail was sold off to a foreign firm.
The Government is in talks with Buckingham Palace after it was discovered legislation paving the way for a sell-off failed explicitly to guarantee the practice.
The Mail on Sunday suggested there was "anger" at the Palace over the omission and suggested it could try to delay the legislation until after the Queen's 2012 Diamond Jubilee - claims postal services minister Ed Davey denied.
While the Bill contains a clause giving the Queen a veto over any use of her image on stamps or other products, it does not insist that her head be shown.
Mr Davey said he queried the lack of specific protection with officials months ago but was told it was not being sought by the Palace and that dropping the monarch's image would be "commercial suicide".
Unhappy with that answer, Mr Davey said, he initiated talks with the Palace - which were "positive and friendly" - to decide how to firm up the protection.
"Any company would be absolutely stark staring mad to decide not to have the Queen's head on its stamps," he said, pointing out that there was no such guarantee in the previous Labour government's draft Bill. "I was told we did not need it but I said several months ago I was not happy with that. I'm extremely confident that the Queen's head will remain on our stamps."
Business Secretary Vince Cable told BBC1's Andrew Marr Show: "We have thought very hard about how we protect the brand - the Royal Family. There is, within the legislation, provision to stop the abuse of it. It has now been pointed out that there's nothing specifically to stop whoever runs the Royal Mail in future dropping the royal head. I think it is unlikely they would because it is a very powerful brand but we will talk to the Palace about whether any further changes need to be made."
A Palace spokesman told the newspaper there were "no outstanding issues on the Bill from our side".
But shadow business secretary John Denham claimed the legislation was deliberately vague. "They are not leaving glaring loopholes like this for no reason. They think the fewer strings they attach, the more money they will get from a foreign buyer," he said.