Labour MPs in bid to force out Chris Williamson over anti-Semitism row
More than 60 MPs have signed a motion calling for a vote in the Parliamentary Labour Party on suspending the whip for 12 months.
Labour MPs have launched a bid to have Chris Williamson – the MP at the centre of a bitter anti-Semistism row – suspended from the parliamentary party.
More than 60 MPs have signed a motion calling for a vote in the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) on withdrawing the whip from Mr Williamson for 12 months for bring the party into disrepute.
The move comes amid widespread anger after the Derby North MP – a staunch supporter of Jeremy Corbyn – was readmitted to the party following a formal warning by an anti-Semitism panel.
He was originally suspended in February after video emerged of him saying the party had been “too apologetic” in the face of criticism of its handling of anti-Semitism complaints.
The latest move to have him suspended from the PLP came after Mr Corbyn ignored calls, led by deputy leader Tom Watson, to step in and withdraw the whip himself.
The motion calls for the case to be referred to the parliamentary committee – the influential backbench body which meets weekly with Mr Corbyn – at its next meeting on Wednesday.
If approved, under standing orders, it would then go a vote of the full PLP at Westminster .
The motion states: “Due to the exceptional circumstances in this case we are of the view that the allegation of bringing the Labour Party into disrepute made against Chris Williamson warrants an investigation by the parliamentary committee under this standing order and full consideration given to a recommendation of removal of the whip to the PLP.
“We therefore seek to ask the PLP to take action to suspend the whip from Chris Williamson for a period of a year.”
Signatories to the motion include Yvette Cooper, Dame Margaret Hodge, Wes Streeting, David Lammy and Diana Johnson.
Under party rules, Mr Williamson would be entitled to make representations to the parliamentary committee before his case is referred to the PLP.
I’m deeply concerned about the decision to readmit Chris Williamson to the Labour Party.— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 28, 2019
I do not understand the rationale behind the decision. The NEC should overrule it and refer it to the NCC. The EHRC should also be invited to look at the specifics of this case.
Meanwhile another senior figure, shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer, said he was “deeply concerned” at the decision to readmit Mr Williamson and called for it to be overturned by the ruling National Executive Committee.
He tweeted that the Equality and Human Rights Commission – which is currently investigating the party for anti-Semitism – should also be invited to look at the “specifics of the case”.
The pressure on Mr Corbyn to take action himself meanwhile intensified after a key ally of the Labour leader said the MP “has to go”.
Jon Lansman, the founder of the grassroots Momentum group, said Mr Williamson had not shown “one iota of contrition” after saying the party had been “too apologetic” in the face of criticism of the way it dealt with anti-Semitism within its ranks.
This tweet reveals not one iota of contrition nor any acknowledgement of wrongdoing following a further formal warning from the Labour Party for behaviour grossly detrimental to the party. Such contempt for the Party’s verdict! He has to go! https://t.co/f9E0MelrZK— Jon Lansman (@jonlansman) June 27, 2019
He accused Mr Williamson of showing “contempt” for the panel’s ruling after he tweeted that he had received an “avalanche” of support from grassroots members.
In response, Mr Lansman tweeted: “This tweet reveals not one iota of contrition nor any acknowledgement of wrongdoing following a further formal warning from the Labour Party for behaviour grossly detrimental to the party. Such contempt for the party’s verdict! He has to go!”
A Labour source insisted that Mr Corbyn was not involved in the party’s disciplinary processes or individual cases.
“It would be wholly inappropriate for a leader to pick and choose cases in the way that is being demanded,” the source said.
“Several of the MPs who have signed (Mr Watson’s statement) have in the past argued against political interference.”