Lawrence: lawyers set out questions
Lawyers investigating alleged corruption in the original investigation into the murder of Stephen Lawrence have laid out new key questions they will aim to answer.
Mark Ellison QC and Alison Morgan, the team that successfully prosecuted two of the black teenager's killers, have been asked to look at claims undercover officers tried to smear the Lawrence family, and that meetings with his friend Duwayne Brooks were bugged.
They have agreed to give a report to the Home Secretary by December 31, outlining whether there should be further action including criminal charges, and whether a public inquiry should be held into the smear claims.
They released details of six questions that they are aiming to answer, the first three covering whether there is evidence of corruption and whether the public inquiry into the investigation was given all relevant information.
The other three are:
What was the role of undercover policing in the Lawrence case, who ordered it and why? Was information on the involvement of undercover police withheld from the Macpherson Inquiry, and, if it had been made available, what impact might that have had on the Inquiry?
What was the extent of intelligence or surveillance activity ordered or carried out by police forces nationally in respect of the Macpherson Inquiry, Stephen Lawrence's family or any others connected with the inquiry or the family?
What was the extent, purpose and authorisation for any surveillance of Duwayne Brooks and his solicitor?
Earlier this week, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe urged the former undercover officer behind the smear claims, Peter Francis, to speak to police. He said: "One of the critical things is to talk to Peter Francis. We've seen him appear on television. We know he's talked to journalists. It would be really helpful if he talked to the investigators because that will help to get to the bottom of it."
However, Stephen's mother Doreen has backed Mr Francis's insistence that he will only speak to a public inquiry. Her lawyer, Imran Khan, said: "He should be giving evidence to a public inquiry, not staying behind closed doors and speaking to police officers. That's the whole point of calling for an inquiry." The review team have asked anyone with relevant information to contact them on firstname.lastname@example.org