Many workers still paid below Living Wage, MSPs told
A panel of sector leaders have been giving evidence to the Finance and Constitution Committee at Holyrood.
Too few workers in Scotland are earning the Living Wage, despite uptake in the scheme being higher than in other parts of the UK, MSPs have heard.
Firms are able to become accredited Living Wage Employers by ensuring workers and any subcontracted staff earn the set rate of £9 per hour, or £10.55 in London.
But despite a high number of companies signing up to the campaign in Scotland, many of the accredited firms have lower number of employees than non-accredited larger private-sector companies, a panel of sector leaders told the Finance and Constitution Committee on Wednesday.
According to statistics published by Living Wage Scotland, around 470,000 people in the country do not earn the real Living Wage.
Some of our focus going forward needs to be about how we make sure that we raise pay in real-terms for the lowest paid. Helen Martin, STUC
Helen Martin, STUC assistant general secretary, told the committee that in some industries where collective bargaining coverage is low, such as in hospitality and agriculture, as well as in some parts of the construction sector, people have seen their pay pushed down consistently over several years.
She said: “It’s important to recognise that we’ve had quite a large living wage campaign in Scotland and that has been very successful in terms of how many companies have signed up to be Living Wage accredited – we’ve probably got the highest in the UK.
“Yet it doesn’t move the measure on how many workers are suffering from pay that’s below the Living Wage, which sits sort of static around 20%.
“So I think some of our focus going forward needs to be about how we make sure that we raise pay in real-terms for the lowest paid and we try to improve collective bargaining coverage, and we try to improve the security of that work in the private sector in particular.”
Anna Ritchie Allan, executive director of Close the Gap, said women are being disproportionately impacted by pay that is lower than the Living Wage.
She said: “I think generally we can say that public sector employers are more likely to have done an equal pay review, which women are more likely to benefit from.
“But in the private sector, we do see widespread pay practice that is premised on discretionary pay, which evidence shows that women are more likely to dis-benefit from that.
“So there’s potential for discrimination in relation to pay but also that sustains women’s lower pay.
“Two-thirds of the workers earning below the Living Wage are women and so there’s another clear gender dimension there as well.”
"Being a #LivingWage employer shows that we truly respect the dignity of our workers” – Bob Padron @PenroseCare— Living Wage Foundation (@LivingWageUK) April 23, 2019
Hear more about what our accredited employers have got to say about paying the real Living Wage to its staff! https://t.co/xYPkLEdOdP pic.twitter.com/xWNozRNA44
IPPR Scotland director Russell Gunson suggested that setting an example on pay within the public sector could influence decision-making at private firms.
He said: “For us, there’s an absolute direct policy interest in what pay looks like in the public sector, but equally what can we do to influence the private sector through setting pay in the public sector is a real interest to us.”
Torsten Bell, Resolution Foundation director, said: “It’s a really important campaign, we support it, we’re members, we sign up, but there’s not enough people affected by the Living Wages rates for it to be what matters for your labour market as a whole yet.”
John Gallacher, Unison’s Scottish organiser, said: “It is important that public sector bodies get Living Wage accreditation because part of the terms of that is that if they have outsourced contracts, those contracted-out services need to apply that Living Wage rate.”