Nigella assistants Elisabetta and Francesca Grillo cleared of fraud
Two former personal assistants to Charles Saatchi and his ex-wife Nigella Lawson have been cleared of fraud.
The jury at Isleworth Crown Court, west London, found Italian sisters Elisabetta and Francesca Grillo not guilty of a single count of fraud each.
It was alleged that between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2012, the women committed fraud by abusing their positions as PAs, using a company credit card for personal gain - and were accused of spending more than £685,000 on themselves.
Elisabetta, 41, sometimes referred to in court as Lisa, and Francesca, 35, both of Kensington Gardens Square, Bayswater, west London, had been accused of living the "high life".
The court heard they used credit cards loaned to them by the TV cook and her ex-husband Mr Saatchi to buy designer goods from Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior and Vivienne Westwood.
Francesca was accused of spending the largest amount on herself - a sum of £580,000.
But the sisters insisted all of their purchases had been authorised.
And in a sensational twist their defence lawyers introduced allegations of drug-taking by Ms Lawson and marital strife involving the celebrity couple.
It was claimed by the defence that there was a culture of secrecy within the high-profile couple's marriage and that the Grillo sisters were aware of Ms Lawson's alleged drug use, while Mr Saatchi was not.
The defence claimed that Elisabetta's knowledge of Ms Lawson's supposed drug use materially affected the TV cook's attitude towards her spending.
After the three-week trial, the jury of seven men and five women rejected the prosecution's claims that the purchases on the cards had been unauthorised.
The jurors had been deliberating for nearly nine hours, having been sent out at 10.20am yesterday.
Neither defendant was in court to hear the verdicts but there was a cry of "yes" from someone in the public gallery.
Elisabetta, who was rushed to hospital last night when she stopped breathing following a panic attack, was with her sister in another room in the court, after Elisabetta collapsed again this morning as she arrived at the building.
After hearing the verdicts, Francesca could be seen smiling and talking excitedly in Italian on her phone as she was being hugged by a supporter. Anthony Metzer QC, representing Elisabetta, said his client was "relieved" and "crying her eyes out".
Mr Metzer and Karina Arden, Francesca's barrister, turned to each other a few moments after the verdicts were delivered and smiled.
When the judge left the court, they hugged members of the defence team, one of whom was crying what appeared to be tears of joy and relief.
Mr Metzer said he was "incredibly thrilled and delighted for both of them", and said he wanted to thank the jury for their attention during the trial.
He added: "I'm a bit lost for words."
He said it had been a "stressful case" and said the "medical issues" in relation to Elisabetta made it even harder.
Francesca's defence counsel, Karina Arden, said: "We're delighted with the result and the attention that the jury gave to the case over many hours and many days. We're reeling."
During the trial the jury heard details of an email sent by Mr Saatchi in which he accused Ms Lawson of being off her head on drugs and branding her "Higella".
He said in that message: "Of course now the Grillos will get off on the basis that you... were so off your heads on drugs that you allowed the sisters to spend whatever they liked and, yes, I believe every word the Grillos have said, who after all only stole money."
Giving his evidence, he said it was a "terrible, terrible mistake" for that email to become public.
Asked if he believed Ms Lawson to have allowed staff to spend what they liked because she was under the influence of drugs, he replied: "Not for a second."
Jurors were told that Elisabetta had not initially planned to use her former boss's alleged drug-taking in her defence in an effort to protect the TV cook.
An original defence case statement for Elisabetta from August did not include allegations of Ms Lawson's drug use because she did not want them raised in court as she felt sympathy for her, jurors heard.
But an extra statement added in November did include the claims.
The additional statement, read to the court by Elisabetta's barrister, Mr Metzer, said his client would assert that Ms Lawson "habitually indulged in the use of Class A and Class B drugs in addition to the abuse of prescription drugs" throughout the PA's employment.
It went on: "This evidence is of substantial importance as it explains why Ms Lawson initially consented, or appeared to consent, to the expenditure as the defendants were intimately connected to her private life and were aware of the drug use which she wanted to keep from her then-husband Charles Saatchi."
Ms Lawson admitted during the trial that she took cocaine with her late husband, John Diamond, when he found out he had terminal cancer, and on another occasion in July 2010 during her troubled marriage to Mr Saatchi.
But the 53-year-old, who also admitted to smoking cannabis, told the court the idea that she is a "drug addict or habitual user of cocaine is absolutely ridiculous".
She described Mr Saatchi as a "brilliant, but brutal man" who subjected her to "intimate terrorism".
The food writer claimed her 10-year marriage to Mr Saatchi became so unhappy it drove her to drugs, which made an "intolerable situation tolerable".
In her evidence, Francesca said she "frequently" found rolled up banknotes with white powder on them in Ms Lawson's handbags.
Belfast Telegraph Digital