Police inspector played game of ‘cat and mouse’ after killing wife, court hears
Darren McKie, 43, admits the manslaughter of wife Leanne, 39, but denies her murder.
A police inspector turned the investigation of his wife’s death into a game of “cat and mouse”, a court has heard.
Darren McKie, 43, admitted the manslaughter of wife Leanne, a 39-year-old detective constable, on the ninth day of his trial, but continues to deny her murder.
The mother-of-three’s body was found in Poynton Lake, Cheshire, on September 29 last year.
In his closing speech at Chester Crown Court on Monday, Nigel Power QC, prosecuting, said the Greater Manchester Police officer had lied during his police interviews to try and cover up his crime.
He said: “He turned the whole thing into a game of cat and mouse.
“He turned it into a game of tactics.
“He turned it into a scheming plot of talk when you think you can get away with it, don’t talk when you think you can’t.
“Most of all he threw away all respect for the process.”
He said McKie had left work on September 28 after his wife discovered his “criminal dishonesty and fraud” when she found out he had applied for a loan in her name.
He returned to their home in Wilmslow at midday and 10 minutes later spoke to a surveyor on the phone to confirm a time for a valuation of the house, in connection with the loan.
“Mrs McKie, you may think, was already dead,” Mr Power said.
“The defendant was just buying some time to deal with her body.”
The jury was told they needed to consider whether McKie, who had been a police officer for 20 years, had intended to cause his wife at least serious bodily harm.
Mr Power ripped up a set of questions he had intended to ask McKie before he changed his plea but read 25 questions which he would have asked him if he had given evidence in the case.
The questions included: “Did you think about your three children as you were killing their mother?”
Mr Power said: “You might think no one could come up with a sensible set of answers which could possibly avoid conviction for murder based on those questions.”
He said for the first nine days of trial McKie, through his counsel, had tried to “cast doubt on what was undoubtedly true” before pleading guilty to manslaughter.
He said: “Now, as a desperate last attempt to avoid conviction for murder, the defendant asks you to accept the proposition (…) he only intended to cause some, not serious, harm when he strangled his wife.”
Mr Power said pathology evidence showed Mrs McKie had died after being strangled for a “prolonged” period of a minute or more.
He said: “The evidence about injuries to the neck structures is utterly compelling, we say, in proving that the defendant intended to cause his wife at the very least serious bodily harm.
“You may think, in fact, he intended to kill.
“You might ask yourselves, if you persisted that long, would you be able to feel the life literally ebbing away from the person you have strangled.”
The case was adjourned until Tuesday.