Top cop ‘prevented’ from properly investigating Counter Corruption Unit
Durham’s Chief Constable says a full investigation would have resolved the issue much sooner.
A top policeman has told MSPs he was “prevented” from carrying out a proper investigation into Police Scotland’s Counter Corruption Unit (CCU).
Michael Barton, Chief Constable of Durham Constabulary, told Holyrood’s Justice Sub-Committee on Policing the terms of reference for his inquiry left him “a little bit confused and a little bit concerned”.
His force was asked by Police Scotland to probe the CCU after guidelines on accessing data were breached by officers attempting to uncover journalist sources in relation to the murder of Emma Caldwell in 2005.
Chief Constable @DurhamPolice tells members the remit he was given by @policescotland to investigate the Counter Corruption Unit was unclear. Crucial difference between 'investigation' and 'inquiry'. He feels he was prevented from investigating properly. pic.twitter.com/mfY6UDpIYK— Justice Committee (@SP_Justice) February 22, 2018
Mr Barton told the committee he had originally been asked to carry out an investigation following a ruling of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), meaning he would have access to all documents and be able to interview people under caution.
He said: “I was initially asked to conduct an investigation and that’s what I agreed with (former Police Scotland Chief Constable) Phil Gormley.
“Subsequent to that, the professional standards department in Police Scotland decided that we should only conduct an inquiry. I argued with them all the way through.
“I should be allowed to do an investigation because that’s the commitment that Police Scotland had given to the IPT and I was never allowed to do an investigation.
Margaret Mitchell MSP hears that there is a problematic culture in @policescotland. @DurhamPolice say they particularly found PS lawyers to be overly defensive, not transparent and risk averse, though lots of good people individually. pic.twitter.com/gvMK2cTnyl— Justice Committee (@SP_Justice) February 22, 2018
“So we were not allowed to have the investigation status which allows us to speak to officers who may or may not have been guilty of misconduct but (who it was) certainly pivotal for us to speak to under caution.
“As far as I was concerned I was asked to investigate and as far as I’m concerned… that’s what the common man or woman would understand what an investigation is. That’s what I wanted to do and I was prevented from doing so.”
Mr Barton said he was frustrated by the decision and had he been allowed to carry out a proper investigation he could have brought an end to the matter “much sooner and much more effectively for the four complainants” who he said had been “gravely wronged”.
.@DurhamPolice tells Members there is 'ineptitude' not 'conspiracy' in Police Scotland. For instance, material obtained 'illegally' in 2015 still held; complaints and misconduct handled separately. pic.twitter.com/Ub7sf03k2u— Justice Committee (@SP_Justice) February 22, 2018
He told MSPs: “I think currently the lawyers in Police Scotland are not transparent and they are overly defensive and they are risk adverse and it got in my way.”
But he said he thought the issues were more a matter of “ineptitude” rather than conspiracy.
Last month an independent investigation into allegations of misconduct against officers in the former CCU, carried out by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), found that there was no misconduct.
Speaking after the session Sub-Committee Convener John Finnie MSP said the evidence was “damning” and Police Scotland would be asked to respond.
Deputy Chief Constable Rose Fitzpatrick said: “A full misconduct investigation was carried out by PSNI at our request, which is the element of the process that Chief Constable Barton says he was prevented from undertaking.
“The PSNI investigation found that there was no misconduct on the part of any of the seven officers who were investigated.
“It is our position, supported by external and independent legal opinion from a QC, that our regulations would not have permitted Chief Constable Barton from carrying out both the complaint enquiry and the misconduct investigation.
“We have previously said that there has been significant organisational learning from these enquiries and a report on this has been provided to the Scottish Parliament’s justice sub-committee.”