A higher capacity for testing at the start of the Covid-19 outbreak could have meant continuing widespread checks in the community, a minister has conceded.
Security minister James Brokenshire said “capacity constraints” earlier in the coronavirus crisis meant contact tracing among the public was abandoned in March.
England’s chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance told MPs on the Health and Social Care Committee on Tuesday that it would have been “beneficial” if testing capacity had been ramped up more quickly.
At the same committee, England’s deputy chief medical officer Dr Jenny Harries admitted that had there been unlimited capacity, a “slightly different approach” could have been taken.
When asked why widespread community testing was halted, Mr Brokenshire told BBC’s Today programme on Wednesday: “We’ve always been informed by the expert advice around this.
“There was a shift in terms of how testing was done – we’ve already heard on some of the issues of overall capacity at that point in time and some of the evidence that Patrick Vallance, our chief scientific officer, has given.”
Asked whether, had there been the capacity, track-and-tracing should have continued, the Home Office minister said: “Would there have been benefit in having that extra capacity, as Patrick Vallance highlighted yesterday? Yes.
“The challenge that we had is that we have some fantastic laboratories, some fantastic expertise, but it has been the capacity constraints that we have had, and therefore how that posed challenges.”
He added that testing has now been “ramped up” – going from 2,000 per day in February to “120,000 at the end of April”.
Asked about the falling numbers of tests undertaken since then, with the Government failing to hit its 100,000 daily target for the third day in a row on Monday, Mr Brokenshire said capacity is there but demand will vary.
He told BBC Breakfast: “I think on that the point is that the capacity is there to meet need, that is the important thing. And whether you look at an individual day, we have scaled that up and so that testing is there if it is needed.”
It comes as a survey by the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (RCSEd) found that 83% of doctors have not been tested for Covid-19.
The surgical college is calling on NHS trusts and health boards to change their guidance on testing for health professionals, after 81% of 378 respondents said their trust was only testing staff with symptoms.
The survey of foundation year doctors up to consultants, working in 151 trusts and health boards across the UK, found that 68% reported colleagues who had developed Covid-19 symptoms in the past two weeks.
But only 10% have gone on to be tested for the virus themselves, RCSEd said.
Ministers abandoned widespread testing and contact tracing on March 12 as the virus spread beyond control in the community.
On Tuesday, Sir Patrick told MPs a greater ability to carry out testing would have improved the UK’s response to the pandemic.
He told the committee: “I think that probably we, in the early phases, and I’ve said this before, I think if we’d managed to ramp up testing capacity quicker it would have been beneficial.”
Meanwhile, Dr Harries said limited resources meant a balance had to be struck at the time.
But she added that “if we had unlimited capacity, and the ongoing support beyond that, then we perhaps would choose a slightly different approach”.
On this point, Mr Brokenshire told BBC Breakfast on Wednesday that while the UK has “world-leading laboratories, overall capacity and scale is something that we did not have”.
He added: “Clearly there will be plenty of time for searching questions once we are through this, and how we ensure that we are as best prepared as we can be, learning and applying lessons from this experience.
“But at the same time we must be rigorously focused on the here and now, looking at these next steps and ensuring that we do that carefully, appropriately, to get through this virus.”