Belfast Telegraph

Home News UK

Woolwich soldier 'most fair target'

Michael Adebolajo during an interview by police after the death of Lee Rigby.
Michael Adebolajo during an interview by police after the death of Lee Rigby.
Fusilier Lee Rigby was "the soldier that was spotted first", a jury has heard

The alleged murderers of Lee Rigby lay in wait for a serviceman to kill and chose the Fusilier just because he was "the soldier that was spotted first", a jury has heard.

Michael Adebolajo, 28, told detectives in interview that he and his accomplice Michael Adebowale, 22, decided that a soldier "was the most fair target" as they had joined the army understanding that their life would be at risk, the Old Bailey heard.

The men are accused of mowing Fusilier Rigby down in a car before hacking him to death with a meat cleaver and knives near Woolwich Barracks in south east London on May 22.

During a police interview from June 1 played to the court, Adebolajo, covered by a blue blanket with a copy of the Koran in front of him, said he had "set out determined that this way we will obey the command of Allah".

The court heard Adebolajo, who referred to Adebowale as Ismail, claim that the alleged murder was not "a personal vendetta".

He said: "I have never met the family of Lee Rigby. Quite possibly I may have walked past one of them in the street. I do not hate them. I do not hate them, nor does my brother Ismail, he does not. This is not a personal vendetta."

Describing the day of the killing, he said: "We decided to wait in the vicinity of the barracks that are in Woolwich. By the command of Allah, Allah's decree, we waited to find a soldier because between us we decided that the soldier is the most fair target because he joins the army with kind of an understanding that your life is at risk."

He added: "We sat in wait and it just so happened that he was the soldier that was spotted first."

Adebolajo said it was "almost as if Allah had chosen" Lee Rigby, and that he had tried to cut his jugular because that was the most humane way of killing.

"It was almost as if Allah had chosen him, when I thought about obeying Allah in the past I thought maybe it is possible to kill a man by driving into him," Adebolajo said.

"When he crossed the road in front of me so casually it was almost as if I was not in control of myself. I accelerated, I hit him and I think I also crashed into a sign post."

He went on: "We did not wish to give him much pain...I could see he was still alive.

"We exited the vehicle and I am not sure how I struck the first blow. The most humane way to kill any creature is to cut the jugular, this is what I believe, this is how we kill our animals in Islam.

"He may be my enemy but he is a I struck at the neck and attempted to remove his head."

He said he thought Fusilier Rigby was the "non-Muslim version of myself and my brother Ismail".

Adebolajo also asked if it would be possible to speak to Fusilier Rigby's family.

He told the counter-terrorism detectives: "To be killed on the battlefield is not something we shy away from and in fact this is something that Allah loves."

Frequently straying away from the point, Adebolajo also praised Ukip leader Nigel Farage, saying that he would answer "straight questions".

He told detectives he had been "generous" with his time in taking part in the interview.

Adebolajo and Adebowale are both accused of murdering Fusilier Rigby, attempting to murder a police officer and conspiracy to murder a police officer. They deny all charges.

After the interview was played, David Gottlieb, for Abebolajo, asked detective constable Dhuval Bhatt why officers had held an urgent interview with the 28-year-old in the wake of the killing.

He told the court: "It was believed that there were others out there who may be planning attacks."


From Belfast Telegraph