British activist ordered to pay £226,000 in Thai fruit company defamation case
Andy Hall was taken to court in one of a series of lawsuits relating to alleged human rights abuses by Natural Fruit.
A court in the Thai capital has ordered a British labour rights activist to pay 10 million baht (£226,000) in damages to a company which filed a civil defamation suit after he helped expose alleged human rights violations at its factory.
The ruling in Bangkok against Andy Hall is just the latest development involving one of four defamation suits filed by pineapple canning company Natural Fruit, which employed migrant Burmese workers who claimed the company had broken labour regulations in abusing them.
Hall has prevailed in one of the two criminal defamation suits against him, while the other is pending, as is another civil suit. He has also filed a counter-suit against Natural Fruit.
Hall left Thailand in 2016, citing intolerable legal harassment after another company, poultry producer Thammakaset Farm, sued him.
I respect the decision of the Court. But I also strongly disagree with the verdict. I have immediately instructed my trusted and experienced legal team to appeal the shocking decision. I did not expect this verdict and am very disappointed by it.— Andy Hall (@Atomicalandy) March 26, 2018
His legal troubles stem from a 2013 report he researched for the Finnish consumer organisation Finnwatch, alleging abuses at Natural Fruit’s facilities. They also concern an interview that he gave to Al-Jazeera on the subject, which was the focus of Monday’s ruling.
Natural Fruit claimed that the report Hall helped research and his interview comments hurt their business.
Hall still works on labour rights issues concerning migrants in Thailand.
This verdict is a major setback for rights of human rights defenders, migrant workers, labour/migration activists and researchers everywhere and casts a dark shadow over recent positive progress the Thai government and Thai industry has made to improve migrant worker conditions.— Andy Hall (@Atomicalandy) March 26, 2018
“This verdict is a major setback for rights of human rights defenders, migrant workers, labour/migration activists and researchers everywhere and casts a dark shadow over recent positive progress the Thai government and Thai industry has made to improve migrant worker conditions,” Hall commented on his Twitter account.
The reputation of Thai companies has been tainted in recent years by allegations of labour abuse, especially in the fishing and seafood industries.
Several companies in that sector have worked with Hall to try to improve conditions, fearing sanctions from countries that take Thai exports.
I will immediately seek to engage the international business community as well as those organisations and close partners who continue to stand firmly behind me. I continue to thank Finnwatch, my legal team and all my supporters for the support they continue to provide me.— Andy Hall (@Atomicalandy) March 26, 2018
“The big issue in Andy Hall’s case is this is an active attempt to try and discourage independent research into company supply chains in Thailand, and this should be a serious concern to all foreign investors who are sourcing production in Thailand,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch.
“When problems in their supply chain are brought to light, companies like Natural Fruit or Thammakaset Farm can so easily sue and ruin the life of an activist to try to keep them silent,” he added.
“It has a chilling effect on this type of research. It has a chilling effect on the freedom of expression in Thailand.”