Britney Spears appears in cleared court to speak on her legal status
The singer and her parents spoke in a rare and secretive joint court appearance in Los Angeles.
Britney Spears has appeared in court at her own request to speak to a judge who oversees the conservatorship that has controlled her affairs for 11 years.
After hearing Spears and her parents speak in a rare and secretive joint court appearance on Friday, the judge ordered an expert evaluation in the conservatorship that has put control of much of the 37-year-old singer’s life in the control of her father.
Only the few left inside know what the three said in the courtroom that was closed to public and media shortly after the hearing began.
But Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Brenda Penny wrote in an order afterwards that all had agreed on a so-called 730 expert evaluation, a process usually used to determine the mental health and competence of a parent in a divorce case.
It is not made clear who would be examined, and whether it would relate to Spears’s relationship to her two sons or her parents’ oversight of her.
Spears’s ex-husband Kevin Federline has custody of their boys, 13-year-old Sean and 12-year-old Jayden, who have frequent visits with their mother.
Spears’s personal lawyer Samuel D Ingham rose at the start of the hearing in front of many reporters and a handful of fans to say that Spears had requested the proceedings so she could speak to the court, and asked that the room be cleared because personal finances and her minor children would be discussed.
The judge agreed, and Spears and her parents entered through side doors when the court was empty.
They left the same way, and when the courtroom was reopened the hearing was over.
For years, Spears has been publicly silent about the severe restrictions on her decisions put in place by the conservatorship established in 2008, when she was having serious personal and psychiatric struggles, many of which played out in public.
Conservatorship, also known as guardianship, is an involuntary status usually reserved for elderly or very ill people who are suffering from dementia or otherwise incapacitated and unable to make decisions for themselves.
Outside the courthouse, about 20 Spears fans protested with signs that read “Free Britney” and “End the conservatorship now”.
View this post on Instagram
Can you believe that this album was released 20 years ago today??!! I can’t. It’s definitely been the journey of a lifetime, full of ups and downs, but I’m grateful for every single moment of it all. Getting to know you all over the years has been such an incredible experience, and has made this all worth it. Thank you for your support from 20 years ago, all the way to today. I am blessed ❤️ #20yearsofbritney
The appearance of Spears’s 66-year-old father Jamie Spears was something of a surprise because he had been in such ill health in recent months that his daughter put her career on hold, delaying the start of a Las Vegas residency, so she could be with him.
Spears mother, Lynne Spears, who is divorced from Jamie Spears, has had no role in the conservatorship, but this week got special permission from the judge to be part of Friday’s hearing.
Britney Spears does not normally attend the hearings on her status.
Her parents’ situations along with the departure from the case of the lawyer who long served as Jamie Spears’s co-executor seemed to suggest significant changes might be coming in the legal arrangement.
But the judge has not indicated she is inclined to make any major moves, and ordered another status hearing for September.
In the same court building on Wednesday, a judge granted Spears a temporary restraining order against Sam Lutfi, a man who once claimed to be her manager and has been in legal fights with her family for a decade.
Spears alleged that Mr Lutfi had been sending harassing and threatening texts to her family, disparaging them on social media and seeking to undermine her conservatorship.
A judge ordered the 44-year-old Mr Lutfi to stay at least 200 yards from Spears and her family.
Mr Lutfi’s lawyer said the decision was disappointing and violated Mr Lutfi’s constitutional rights.