Former South Carolina governor and congressman Mark Sanford has decided to launch a longshot Republican challenge to US President Donald Trump.
“I am here to tell you now that I am going to get in,” Mr Sanford said in an interview on Fox News Sunday.
When asked why he was taking on an incumbent who is popular within the party, Mr Sanford said: “I think we need to have a conversation on what it means to be a Republican.
“I think that as the Republican Party, we have lost our way.”
Mr Sanford joins Joe Walsh, a former tea party-backed, one-term congressman from Illinois, and Bill Weld, the former Republican governor of Massachusetts, as primary challengers to Mr Trump.
The 59-year-old has long been an outspoken critic of the president’s.
He frequently questioned Mr Trump’s motivations and qualifications during the run-up to the 2016 presidential election and called his candidacy “a particularly tough pill to swallow”.
Ultimately, though, Mr Sanford said he would support Mr Trump in the 2016 general election, although he had “no stomach for his personal style and his penchant for regularly demeaning others”, continuing a drumbeat that the then-candidate release his tax returns.
As Mr Sanford sought re-election to his post representing South Carolina’s 1st District in 2018, drawing a primary challenger who embraced Mr Trump, the president took interest in the race.
State Representative Katie Arrington repeatedly aired ads featuring Mr Sanford’s on-air critiques of Mr Trump and attached the “Never Trump” moniker to Mr Sanford, a condemnation in a state that Mr Trump carried by double digits in 2016.
Although unlikely to have had a significant impact on the results, Mr Trump endorsed Ms Arrington just hours before the polls closed, tweeting that Mr Sanford “has been very unhelpful to me in my campaign” and that “he is better off in Argentina” – a reference to Mr Sanford’s secret 2009 rendezvous to South America for an extramarital affair while his in-the-dark gubernatorial staff told reporters he was hiking the Appalachian Trail.
Asked if that incident could be a distraction to his campaign, Mr Sanford said that the aftermath had forced him to attain a new “level of empathy”.
“I profoundly apologise for that,” he added, noting that South Carolina voters subsequently forgave him politically and sent him back to Congress.
Days after his first-ever political loss, Mr Sanford described Trumpism as “a cancerous growth”, warning the Republican Party that the cancer is spreading.
I respect the view of many Republican friends who have suggested that I not run, but I simply counter that competition makes us stronger. I believe competition of ideas is good, not bad, for the Republican Party and for our country.— Mark Sanford (@MarkSanford) September 8, 2019
“We have a president that will tell numerous dis-truths in the course of a day, yet that’s not challenged,” Mr Sanford said.
“What’s cancerous here is in an open political system, there has to be some measure of objective truth.”
Mr Sanford won three terms for US House in the 1990s, then two four-year terms as governor before the affair marred the end of his second term.
He returned to politics a couple of years later and won a special election to his old US House seat in 2013, holding on twice more.
Throughout his political career, Mr Sanford has played up his outsider credentials – both in the US House, where he supported a box to check on federal tax returns to put three dollars towards the national debt, and as governor, bringing a pair of squealing pigs to the state House and Senate chamber to protest against what he called pork spending.
As the main focus of his presidential bid, Mr Sanford has said he plans to zero in on holding down federal spending, an issue on which he has railed since his initial stint in the House.
Known during his Capitol Hill years as a deficit hawk, Mr Sanford expressed a determination to bring debt and fiscal restraint into the national conversation.
“Let’s go out and try to force a conversation about that which is not being talked about in this country,” Mr Sanford said.
If he had not decided to run for president, Mr Sanford had said he might start a think tank devoted to fiscal conservatism.
Mr Sanford will not be able to compete in his home state of South Carolina, which on Saturday – along with Nevada and Kansas – announced it will not hold presidential nominating balloting in 2020, erecting more hurdles for the longshot candidates challenging Mr Trump.
Mr Sanford’s possible presidential motivations immediately drew scepticism from some South Carolina political observers who have watched him plot a political comeback before and questioned whether he was merely seeking publicity and relevance following a defeat in last year’s primary.
Last month, Mr Sanford acknowledged his motivations in an interview with the Associated Press .
“It’s not as if I’m saying, you know, I think I can become president,” he said.
“But I think you can change the debate, and you might even have an impact on the general election.”