A Saudi court has sentenced a member of an independent human rights organisation to eight years in prison in the latest guilty verdict to be issued against the group's members, Amnesty International said.
Abdulaziz al-Shubaily is a founding member of the Saudi Association for Civil and Political Rights, known by its Arabic acronym, Hasem.
He had acted as a legal representative for nine other founding Hasem members.
Amnesty said he was tried on Sunday by the Specialised Criminal Court - established to try terrorism cases, but increasingly used for trials of political activists whose work is deemed a national security risk.
A sweeping anti-terrorism law came into effect in 2014, defining acts as vague as "defaming the state's reputation" as terrorism.
Amnesty said al-Shubaily was also barred from travelling abroad for eight years after his release and forbidden from writing on social media.
His charges included "communicating with foreign organisations" and providing information to Amnesty for use in its reports.
He was additionally charged with inciting people to breach public order and accusing security forces of repression and torture, according to Amnesty.
In 2013, prominent founding Hasem activists, Mohammed al-Qahtani and Abdullah al-Hamid, were sentenced to 10 and 11 years respectively.
Soon after, other verdicts against the group followed against nearly a dozen members.
In April of this year, Issa al-Hamid, another founding member of Hasem and Abdullah al-Hamid's brother, was sentenced to nine years in prison in what Amnesty International described at the time as part of a wider "ruthless onslaught against civil society" by Saudi authorities.
The group was shut down three years ago, not long after a swell of Arab Spring uprisings demanding political reforms, transparency and social justice swept across much of the region.
A secret section of the 9/11 Commission Report that reportedly details Saudi Arabian funding for the attacks contains “uncorroborated, un-vetted” information and should not be released, the director of the CIA has said.
It seemed like a good idea at the time. Thanks to the immediacy of television, innocent civilians in Syria were writhing from gas attacks before our eyes, with the blame laid on their own government.
United States' Secretary of State John Kerry and its UN ambassador, Samantha Power have been pushing for more assistance to be given to the Syrian rebels.
Why has so much journalism succumbed to propaganda? Why are censorship and distortion standard practice? Why is the BBC so often a mouthpiece of rapacious power? Why do the New York Times and the Washington Post deceive their readers?
Top Iranian military commander, Brigadier General Ahmad Reza Pourdastan, has accused the United States of carrying out the 9/11 terror attacks in order to justify an invasion of the Middle East "with the goal of ruling it".
Details of more than a dozen British Isis members are among 22,000 recruits reportedly revealed in a cache of leaked documents from the terrorist group’s stringent “entrance interviews”.
There are many reasons why Belgium has become a hotbed of radical Islamism. Some of the answers may lie in the implanting of Saudi Salafist preachers in the country from the 1960s.
It’s not every day you get to bust a Saudi prince. Amphetamines. Twenty-five boxes and six suitcases, all – according to photos and video – stamped with the Saudi Arabia emblem of palm tree and crossed swords, to be shipped out on a private Saudi jet.
Little Aylan al-Kurdi was part of Dave’s “swarm”. A bit difficult to brush that one off for PR Dave, of course, because Aylan wasn’t black or brown or “blobbed” out by television’s techie-taste dictators, but looked – let’s face it, for this is what it is about – rather like our three-year-olds.
In Geneva tomorrow a range of human rights organisations will co-sponsor a side event at the 30th session of the UN Human Rights Council addressing "the extensive use of torture and other forms of cruel and degrading treatment in the Saudi criminal justice system".
It’s all about the Saudis. No matter how complex the new Yemeni civil war may appear – nor how powerful the Houthi rebels have become in the capital of Sanaa where they now encircle the presidential palace – it’s the Zaidi sect of Shiism which the Houthis represent that frightens the Sunni Wahabi monarchy of Saudi Arabia, and not without reason.
King Abdullah's complaint that British authorities ignored Saudi warnings of an imminent attack on the UK before the atrocities of 7 July 2005 might be more convincing if they came from the ruler of a country less sympathetic to the Islamist agenda.