Trump’s envoy to Ukraine resigns as impeachment gathers pace
Kurt Volker has quit amid the ongoing whistleblower probe into the President.
Kurt Volker, a former US ambassador to NATO caught in the middle of a whistleblower complaint over President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine, has resigned from his post as special envoy to the Eastern European nation.
The move came as House Democrats took their first concrete steps in the impeachment investigation of Mr Trump, issuing subpoenas demanding documents from Mike Pompeo and scheduling legal depositions for other State Department officials.
A US official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Mr Volker told Secretary of State Pompeo on Friday of his decision to leave the job.
The move followed disclosures Mr Volker had connected Mr Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani with Ukrainian officials to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his family over allegedly corrupt business dealings.
The State Department had no immediate comment on Mr Volker’s resignation and has said only that he put Mr Giuliani in touch with an aide to Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
It doesn’t get more serious than this. It is a betrayal of his oath of office for President Trump to pressure a foreign country to interfere in our elections. And yet that is exactly what @realDonaldTrump did. #TruthExposed pic.twitter.com/MnB5ARJR35— Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) September 27, 2019
News of the House Democrats issuing subpoenas came at the end of a stormy week of revelation and recrimination, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi framing the impeachment inquiry as a sombre moment for a divided nation.
Trump, for his part, insisted anew that his actions and words had been “perfect” and the whistleblower’s complaint about his comments to the leader of Ukraine might well be the work of “a partisan operative.”
Meanwhile, Mr Trump has been warned against retaliating as he lashed out at anyone who might have helped the intelligence whistleblower whose complaint has led to the impeachment probe launched against him this week.
The whistleblower’s complaint alleged the president abused the power of his office to “solicit interference from a foreign country” in next year’s US election.
In a July 25 phone call, days after ordering a freeze to some military assistance for Ukraine, Mr Trump prodded the new President Zelenskiy to investigate Democratic rival Mr Biden, and volunteered the assistance of Mr Giuliani and attorney general William Barr.
Sounding more and more like the so-called Whistleblower isn’t a Whistleblower at all. In addition, all second hand information that proved to be so inaccurate that there may not have even been somebody else, a leaker or spy, feeding it to him or her? A partisan operative?— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 27, 2019
Late on Thursday, Mr Trump denounced people who might have talked to the whistleblower as “close to a spy” and suggested they engaged in treason, an act punishable by death.
On Friday, he targeted the complainant, a CIA officer, tweeting: “Sounding more and more like the so-called Whistleblower isn’t a Whistleblower at all.”
Ms Pelosi, speaker of the House of Representatives, told MSNBC’s Morning Joe show: “I’m concerned about some of the president’s comments about the whistleblower.”
She said House panels conducting the impeachment probe will make sure there is no retaliation against people who provided information in the case.
On Thursday, House Democratic chairmen called Mr Trump’s comments “witness intimidation” and suggested efforts by him to interfere with the potential witness could be unlawful.
Mr Trump’s Friday comment questioning the whistleblower’s status could foreshadow an effort to argue that legal protection laws do not apply to the person, opening a new front in the president’s battles with Congress.
The intelligence community’s inspector general found the whistleblower’s complaint “credible” despite finding indications of the person’s support for a different political candidate.
As more Democrats have lent support to investigations that could result in the removal of the president, Ms Pelosi has moved to focus the probe on the Ukraine matter, rather than the array of other open inquiries.
“I think we have to stay focused, as far as the public is concerned, on the fact that the president of the United States used taxpayer dollars to shake down the leader of another country for his own political gain,” she said on Friday.
If that perfect phone call with the President of Ukraine Isn’t considered appropriate, then no future President can EVER again speak to another foreign leader!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 27, 2019
She declined to provide a timeline for the House impeachment investigation.
“They will take the time that they need, and we won’t have the calendar be the arbiter,” she said. But she added: “It doesn’t have to drag on.”
Republicans are straining under the uncertainty of being swept up in the most serious test yet of their alliance with the Trump White House.
“We owe people to take it seriously,” said senator Marco Rubio, a one-time Trump rival who is now a member of the intelligence committee.
“Right now, I have more questions than answers,” he said. “The complaint raises serious allegations, and we need to determine whether they’re credible or not.”
We on Senate Intel have been given an important task, a task I intend to complete— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) September 27, 2019
No rush to judgment or circling of wagons
Avoid hysteria,red herrings & straw men
Don’t reach conclusion first & then seek out facts that support it
Learn the facts BEFORE forming opinions
Fresh questions were raised late on Thursday about how the White House and the Justice Department handled the whistleblower complaint.
The administration initially blocked Congress from viewing it, and only released a redacted version to legislators this week after the impeachment inquiry had begun.