US resolution on Syria chemical weapons attacks vetoed by Russia at UN
US Ambassador Nikki Haley said the US ‘went the extra mile’ to get Russian support for the proposal.
Russia has vetoed a US-drafted UN resolution that would have condemned last weekend’s suspected gas attack near Damascus and established a new body to determine responsibility for Syrian chemical weapons attacks.
The vote on Tuesday afternoon in the 15-member Security Council was 12 in favour, Bolivia joining Russia in voting no, and China abstaining.
US Ambassador Nikki Haley said the US “went the extra mile” to get Russian support for the resolution to ensure that a new investigative body would be impartial, independent and professional – things she said would not be guaranteed by a rival Russian resolution.
Russia’s UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia accused the United States of wanting the resolution to fail “to justify the use of force against Syria”.
At a certain point you’re either for an independent and impartial investigation, or you’re not. Today for the 6th time Russia failed the Syrian people and vetoed a mechanism that would have held those who use chemical weapons against them accountable.— Archive: Ambassador Nikki Haley (@AmbNikkiHaley) April 10, 2018
He said the resolution was trying to recreate the old expert body, whose extension Moscow blocked in November. He called that body “a puppet in the hands of anti-Damascus forces”.
A Russian resolution that would have created a new expert body to determine responsibility for the chemical weapons attacks was also rejected.
The resolution needed at least nine yes votes in the 15-member council for approval but only six countries voted in favour. Seven council members, including the US, Britain and France, voted against the proposal and two abstained.
Ms Haley said the draft resolution was not impartial or independent since it would allow Russia to veto investigators and staff for the new body — and to block its findings.
She accused Russia of repeatedly shielding President Bashar Assad instead of working for Security Council unity.
Later, the council rejected a Russian resolution that would have welcomed an investigation by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPWC) into the suspected poison gas attack.
In the late vote, five countries voted in favour, four voted against and six abstained.
British ambassador Karen Pierce said the UK opposed the resolution because an OPCW investigative team is already headed to Syria and the Russian text did not include a new body to determine accountability for chemical weapons attacks.