Belfast Telegraph

Christians are under attack in the Middle East ... can a visit from the Pope convince them to stay?

Papal message: Pope Francis walks alongside Muslim clerics during a visit to the prestigious Sunni institution Al-Azhar in Cairo yesterday
Papal message: Pope Francis walks alongside Muslim clerics during a visit to the prestigious Sunni institution Al-Azhar in Cairo yesterday

By Robert Fisk

Almost exactly a quarter of a century ago, I wrote a story which was headlined: 'Exodus: a story of Christians'. It told the tragedy of those people of the faith who were fleeing the lands of the forefathers.

I interviewed the only hermit left in Lebanon, in a cave in the north of the country, and he said to me: "I am the only hermit left in all the Middle East." His eyes creased in happiness when I acknowledged his unique theological condition. "I will never leave Lebanon," he said. "No Christian should leave the Holy Land. Those who have left will come back."

He exuded faith: childlike, passionate, precise, untrammelled by contradiction or facts. And he was wrong.

As I wrote at the time - from Iraq, from the West Bank, from Lebanon and from Egypt, "probably" (that was my word then) from Syria, too - the Christians were leaving.

A community of 14 million people, the inheritors of the original, Eastern Church of Christ, were draining away from lands now inhabited by up to 160 million Muslims.

Today, the Copts of Egypt alone may be as many as 15 million, but make up only 10% of the population. Under attack from Islamists, they are leaving for the West in huge numbers - one reason the Pope landed in Egypt yesterday in the hope (a plaintive one, I fear) that Christians and Muslims can take violence out of religion.

We pretend to care very much for these Christians, of course. (Indeed, we care so much that even the new American President, Donald Trump, was too frightened to call the 1915 slaughter of one-and-a-half million Armenian Christians a genocide this week.)

Sign In

I was much moved some two years ago, in the little Syrian town of Qamishleh, by the local priests and bishops of the Maronite (Catholic), Armenian and Orthodox Churches, who pleaded with me to stop suggesting that the Christians should seek sanctuary in the West.

If they went to Canada, or the US, or Europe, they said, they will become part of a secular world, in which they would lose their faith. This should not be the fate of the Christians of the Middle East.

But, after 44 Christian Copts were killed in two church bombings in Egypt this month, can they stay? When Christian Copts are murdered in Sinai, can they stay? When Isis in Iraq tells them to convert or die, can they stay?

By 1999, only 10% of the people of Jerusalem were Christian. Just 30% of Nazareth's population of 172,000 were Christian.

In the British mandate of Palestine, the Christian population was 9.6% of the population. By 1999, it was 2.9%. Meanwhile, 35% of the Christians of the West Bank and Gaza left between 1967 and 1999. And Christianity is meant to be one of the world's great religions.

I have long debated with Middle Eastern people whether this all goes back to the Crusades. In 1996, I had a long conversation with an Egyptian Muslim, Heba Raouf Ezzat, and this is what she said: "We are a different culture. We are a different civilisation. And usually, people think of those who are different as weird, as strange, as sometimes puzzling, sometimes as the 'opponent'. So I think this is the first thing.

"You had a long history of colonial relations with our region and there was always this conflictual relation that we were 'the enemy' - especially during the Crusades - and I think that the Crusades is the key word. This is a history which you can't just throw out of the window. This is a history that was there, blood was shed.

"Through the centuries, both sides - actually, not only you, but we as well - started making our own myths regarding 'the enemy' ... and it lasted for two centuries or so and you can't just forget it, or think it's not important, or it's a very minor issue. There is history and both cultures do have history. And people just don't forget."

But, I said to Ezzat, we had Richard the Lionheart and she had Salahedin "and you won".

She would not accept this. "And we were defeated later by different people and with different tools," she replied. "I'm not the person who would say 'Oh we should overcome this'. I think people do have their differences. And it's important to look and analyse and try to see why people have their differences and how they can run these differences through time and in different situations. But I think that both sides are responsible for this."

What will the Pope say to that? Or to the Grand Imam of al-Azhar in Cairo, Sheikh Ahmed el-Tayeb? Will they be up to the task of self-incrimination?

I recall reading some years ago Amin Maalouf's wonderful book, The Crusades Through Arab Eyes, wherein he recorded how the Crusaders, on their way to Jerusalem, stooped to cannibalism. They ate some of the Muslim dead after a pitched battle in a city in Syria. And the name of that city was Homs.

What can I say? Read the book.

Belfast Telegraph


From Belfast Telegraph