Flying rainbow flag is State-sponsored bias
Why is the rainbow flag flying over an Army barracks (News, July 7)?
Why are 1.7% of the population favoured at all costs - even at the expense of the regimental flags which are considered much more a matter of pride than the LGBT variety? Why is a lifestyle choice considered more important than, for example, an ethnic minority? Why not fly the Chinese dragon at their New Year celebrations?
"Inclusivity" and "diversity" are terms used to favour one small group of people at the expense of others who may disagree with them.
LGBTs have the right to choose their lifestyle, but they are wrong to try to impose it on everyone else. And public officials are wrong in aiding and abetting them.
This is just State-sponsored bias.
Tandragee, Co Armagh
Belfast Telegraph Digital