Dario Gradi criticised in Chelsea sex abuse report
Chelsea have issued an unreserved apology for the “terrible past experiences” of some former youth players
Dario Gradi missed a chance to stop “dangerous and prolific child abuser” Eddie Heath from sexually assaulting youth players at Chelsea, a report has found.
Chelsea have issued an unreserved apology for the “terrible past experiences” of some former youth players, on publishing Charles Geekie QC’s report into non-recent child sexual abuses.
Heath coached Chelsea’s youth teams from 1968 to 1979 and died in December 1983, with the Stamford Bridge board now branding his conduct “beyond reprehensible”.
“Mr Gradi is the single example of a clear account of an adult in a position of responsibility at the club being informed about an allegation in relation to Mr Heath at the very time of the events complained of,” states Geekie in his report.
“The consequence of my findings is that the complaint made about Mr Heath was not referred to more senior members of the club and an opportunity to prevent Mr Heath from going on to abuse others was lost.
“I consider it absolutely necessary in order to achieve the purpose of the review to name Mr Gradi.”
Chelsea have also published Barnardo’s external report into non-recent racial abuse at the club.
“The board wishes to thank all the survivors and witnesses who came forward to assist the reviews and the club apologises unreservedly for the terrible past experiences of some of our former players,” said Chelsea, in a lengthy statement.
“It is evident that Heath was a dangerous and prolific child abuser. His conduct was beyond reprehensible.
Mr Gradi is the single example of a clear account of an adult in a position of responsibility at the club being informed about an allegation in relation to Mr Heath at the very time of the events complained of Charles Geekie QC
“The report details how abuse was able to occur unchallenged, and the life-changing impact it had on those affected.”
Gradi was appointed an assistant coach at Chelsea in January 1971, with the review unable to establish if he left in 1975 or 1976.
Now 78, Gradi is accused of attempting to smooth over allegations of Heath assaulting a youth player during a visit to the player and his father.
Geekie explains in the review that Gradi knew he would be named in the report, with the ex-Crewe chief eventually giving his own account to the inquiry.
Gradi told the Geekie report that the father of the boy did not want the complaint to “get Eddie Heath into trouble”, insisting he informed club management of the allegations.
“The fact that he (the father) didn’t want it to go any further, in other words, took the pressure off me as far as I was concerned,” Gradi is quoted as saying in the Geekie report.
“I think I probably would have tried to stand up for Eddie Heath a bit.”
When asked if he offered an apology, Gradi told the Geekie report: “No. What could I apologise for?”
Gradi has cooperated with the FA’s own historic sexual abuses review, headed by Clive Sheldon QC, and has been contacted for comment.
Geekie described Gradi’s accounts as “unconvincing” in his report, insisting his words “challenge credibility”.
The full 252-page Geekie report paints a harrowing picture of Heath targeting vulnerable boys, earning their trust, abusing them – then using “fear to secure silence”.
The former Chelsea youth coach is characterised in witness statements as a “Frankie Howerd character, routinely using sexualised banter and innuendo”.
The report states: “He used pornography to sexualise boys, he made use of gifts to draw boys closer to him.
“He targeted vulnerable boys and exploited their need for attention to create dependence upon him.
“He manipulated and groomed family members in order to persuade them to allow access to their children.”
Chelsea chairman Bruce Buck has met personally with 17 of the abuse survivors, with the club confirming compensation will be paid.
“While we implement the recommendations of the report, it is important that we also look to the future and ensure that abuse like this never happens again anywhere in football,” read Chelsea’s statement.
“Survivors of child sexual abuse are also able to claim compensation by writing to the club.
“Claims for compensation are being assessed and managed by the club’s insurer and the club will support survivors through the process.
“The club has formalised the services that we have been providing to players into a dedicated player support service.
“We thank the survivors again for their bravery and dignity and the role they have played, and continue to play, in ensuring a safer future for our sport.”
The Barnardo’s review into historic racial abuse also criticised Chelsea’s former academy director Gwyn Williams.
Williams and Graham Rix have previously strongly denied allegations they racially abused Stamford Bridge youth players.
Rix worked at Chelsea between 1993 and 2000, while Williams joined the Blues in 1979 and left in 2006.
We thank the survivors again for their bravery and dignity and the role they have played, and continue to play, in ensuring a safer future for our sport Chelsea statement
“Barnardo’s reviewers take the view that, whilst it appears that Graham Rix could be aggressive and bullying, on the evidence presented to them, he was not racially abusive. In the view of the reviewers the same cannot be said of Gwyn Williams,” read the report into non-recent racist abuse.
“The evidence strongly indicates to the reviewers that there was racially abusive behaviour towards black young people at Chelsea Football Club during the 1980s and 1990s and that based on information from those spoken to, that Gwyn Williams was the instigator of such abuse.”
Rix and Williams have been contacted for comment.
England World Cup-winner Sir Geoff Hurst declined a formal interview with the historic sexual abuse inquiry team, though did give short evidence in two phone calls.
Hurst was Chelsea manager when Heath was sacked in 1979.
Hurst said in a statement on Tuesday: “In response to the articles appearing in the press regarding Eddie Heath today I would like to make the following points for clarification.
“1. I was interviewed by the powers that be via telephone and told them exactly what occurred when I sacked Eddie Heath. I saw no reason to meet in person to repeat the same facts.
“2. Eddie Heaths title was chief scout but he spent most of his time in the stands at Stamford Bridge and rarely if ever on scouting trips. The club including the youth section was not doing well so I made the decision to sack him for footballing reasons.
“3. At no time before I became manager of Chelsea, during my time as manager, nor for any of the intervening years did I hear any untoward allegations in respect of Mr Heath until a few years ago when his situation was made public.
“Hopefully this clarifies my situation.”