Belfast Telegraph

World Cup 2018

Fixtures & Results

Belgium BEL 5

Tunisia TUN 2

REPORT

South Korea KOR 1

Mexico MEX 2

REPORT

Germany GER 2

Sweden SWE 1

REPORT

England ENG 6

Panama PAN 1

REPORT

Japan JPN 2

Senegal SEN 2

REPORT

Poland POL 0

Colombia COL 3

REPORT

Saudi Arabia SAU

Egypt EGY

Uruguay URY

Russia RUS

Spain ESP

Morocco MAR

Iran IRN

Portugal POR

Denmark DNK

France FRA

Australia AUS

Peru PER

Iceland ISL

Croatia CRO

Nigeria NGA

Argentina ARG

Mexico MEX

Sweden SWE

South Korea KOR

Germany GER

Switzerland SUI

Costa Rica CRI

Serbia SRB

Brazil BRA

Senegal SEN

Colombia COL

Japan JPN

Poland POL

Panama PAN

Tunisia TUN

England ENG

Belgium BEL

Home Sport Football Scottish

King’s demands over probe into MacLennan and Celtic's Desmond rejected

 

By Andy Newport

The Scottish Professional Football League has again come to the defence of its chairman Murdoch MacLennan by insisting he acted “impeccably” during his business links with a company connected to Celtic’s largest individual shareholder Dermot Desmond.

League chiefs were forced to respond after Rangers chairman Dave King reiterated his call for an investigation into MacLennan’s recent appointment as non-executive chairman of Independent News & Media Group (INM).

Desmond is listed as a major shareholder in INM.

King made his initial demand for a probe on Tuesday, when he claimed MacLennan’s new role was a conflict on interest, before following it up on Wednesday with a statement which alleged MacLennan had not informed SPFL board members of the two Celtic shareholders’ interest in INM.

The SPFL — which quickly slapped down the Gers’ chiefs demands on Tuesday — has now followed up once more with a lengthy statement.

“Rather than attempt to communicate through the media, it is far more appropriate that any substantive issues are presented to the SPFL board for careful and detailed consideration, based on a sound legal analysis of the facts,” it said.

“In its statement of 29 May, Rangers FC claimed ‘a business relationship’, existed between the SPFL chairman and minority shareholders in a SPFL club, despite no evidence of such a relationship being presented. There is no mention of the previously claimed ‘business relationship’ in the 30 May statement.

“In the 30 May statement, the central allegation has now become that ‘there was non-disclosure of the conflict that immediately arose when the SPFL chairman accepted’ his appointment as a non-executive director of International News & Media PLC (IN&M plc). As with the 29 May statement, no detail was provided to support this allegation.

“The existence of a conflict of interest and the steps to be taken where it arises in a company context are set out in the Companies Act 2006. There has been no attempt to explain the factual basis of the claim that a conflict of interest, or circumstances which might reasonably have been regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest, had arisen.

“The facts are that minority shareholders in IN&M plc also hold minority shareholdings in Celtic plc, which in turn holds just over 2% of the shares in the SPFL.

“The chairman of the SPFL holding a non-executive position on the board of IN&M plc, does not constitute the basis for the existence of a conflict of interest or of circumstances which might reasonably have been regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest, on the part of the SPFL chairman.”

Belfast Telegraph

Daily News Headlines Newsletter

Today's news headlines, directly to your inbox.

Popular

From Belfast Telegraph