Tiger Woods will take on old foe Phil Mickelson in a winner-takes-all exhibition match for a purse worth 9million US dollars (£6.96million) on November 23.
Here, Press Association Sport answers the key questions about the contest in Las Vegas.
The possibility of a contest between the former Ryder Cup team-mates has been mooted since the Players Championship in May, when they played the first two rounds at Sawgrass in the same group. Mickelson told his pre-tournament press conference that the excitement around the pairing “got him thinking” about how to bypass the “ancillary stuff of a tournament and just go head-to-head and just have kind of a high-stake, winner-take-all match”. Told about the idea later, Woods said: “I’m definitely not against that. We’ll play for whatever makes him uncomfortable.”
According to Mickelson, the format will be traditional match play, although there will be “in-play” competitions like closest to the pin or longest drive. The two players, as well as their caddies, will also be wearing microphones throughout the match.
The match will be broadcast on pay-per-view at a price yet to be determined.
This is understood to be a compromise with the PGA Tour to keep it below the USD10million on offer to the winner of the overall FedEx Cup title. PGA Tour approval will likely have been required as the World Cup is taking place in Australia over the same weekend.
Masters champion Patrick Reed said in July that he would be more interested if that was the case, otherwise “it’s just kind of an exhibition.” But when asked by Press Association Sport if he and Woods would be putting up the cash, Mickelson said with a smile: “I would hope for a sponsor.”
This is the key question and will split people into two camps. On the one hand, this is a potentially fun contest between a resurgent Woods and the popular Mickelson, two players with massive fan bases and 19 major titles between them. On the other hand, it is arguably a pointless exhibition between two 40-somethings with one win between them since 2013, who already have an obscene amount of money and are playing to win even more from a sponsor. It would have been far more interesting when they were ranked first and second in the world and were not so friendly.